I don't blog. Ha. That is what's called a paradox - a statement that contradicts itself (why do I sound like I'm explaining to my students?) A paradox is often confused with an oxymoron, usually by dumb testosterone-filled male quadropeds or by their younger clueless acne-ridden teenage versions. An oxymoron is a phrase of two words that contradicts itself. A good oxymoron is much harder to come by than a good paradox. A good one I've come across is happily married, but that will be the subject of another blog-nicht.
My last blog post was back in August 2004 (I think) and as I reviewed that smattering of writing, I realised that I only started the blog as a means of finding a way to connect with my students then. Blogging is not in my nature. For the friends who know me, this will seem semi-paradoxical as well. Blogging, to me, is akin to going out to a bar, sitting down next to a stranger and reeling off your personal history and the events of your day, week, whatever. I have no problems speaking to a complete stranger, or even being friendly, or relating personal experiences to help others relax and open up. However I derive no personal gratification or sense of release from that, which I assume (possibly wrongly) is what most bloggers are after.
Why then am I blogging now?? It's obviously not my style. I'm the face-to-face talk kind of person. I love to read body language and subtle vibes and signs and spend exciting waking and sleeping moments deciphering the nuances and possibilities of interpretation. In fact, I'm actually pretty much of an alien to the whole Internet generation, not that I'm incompetent at it - I simply choose to exist outside of its influence as far as possible: I refuse to read email, I surf the Internet only for lesson research (approximately once per school term), I NEVER read blogs and never watch tv (okay, this is irrelevant). Well, God sure pulls a funny sucker punch.
I recently read a blog, or rather, parts of its entirety. I don't know how it happened but a colleague was insisting on showing me her pretty friend's wedding photo, and since she couldn't remember which archive the photo was in we pretty much skimmed through the different months searching for that elusive frame of feminine photogeniality. Rather inadvertently, I read the few scattered poems that littered the blog. They were simple, but honest and true (tautology). Most importantly, I was intrigued. The blogger wrote well (I was informed that she was an English teacher - very elucidating) and I liked what she wrote and the way she wrote - from the heart. I liked that she chose poetry to express herself, that her poetry was unpretentious. Every time we chanced upon a poem on that haphazard search, I asked politely to pause and read. More intrigue. We didn't find the photo but saw quite a few others. The one that left an impression was of the pretty friend in a flowery apron holding up pineapple jam-stained hands.
We postponed the search for another whimsical time and I didn't really think much about it, but the pull of poetry was strong. The following day, I surfed her blog for more poems and just out of curiosity checked out her profile. What she listed as her occupation touched, or rather plucked, a chord in me and the reveberations persist even now. Wonderer. And I, His chosen wanderer and exile. I had appreciated her sense of humour and wordplay before, but this went deeper. It felt like a sign. The first post on her archive was a poem. It was written to another guy but the heartfelt words reached into me and stirred something deep within. A simple rhyming couplet, but so very effective.
I am writing all this now, because if I am unable to be introduced to her in this little window of opportunity that will close soon, and I cannot tell her this face-to-face, I want her to know. I think she's special. I think that God willing, I would like to be the one that holds her heart, and cherish it.